In getting old zandtao has chosen a life of a recluse; this is a reasonable position to take as he does not have the energy to cope, and he makes the effort to consciously evolve consciousness through his autonomous path. As zeer zandtao recognises that vision is integral to the path and being on the path. But vision is not just spiritual. Zandtao has focussed his vision on the understanding of love and patriarchy following his autonomy, but vision also needs to apply to patriarchy in other ways.
This was brought home to zandtao in what he calls the Gunn battle in which he made a mistake of lacking circumspection and then a recognition that this lack of circumspection is a lack of vision. The Gunn battle occurred because Gunn is in pain because he has family in Tel Aviv, and Gunn discusses the issue as a form of Israeli evangelising. Zandtao got sucked into a discussion by an outgoing bullish demeanour changing to a gentle demeanour when discussing the Israeli question. As a result zandtao caused Gunn pain, it was too late when zandtao discovered the source of Gunns pain.
Globally censorship/intimidation by Israel and Israeli sympathisers has been on the increase. The most recent example zandtao has been aware of is the way it was used in the UK against Corbyn the anti-racist. It became very clear that Zionist Israel was conflating antisemitism with the support of the Israeli state, thus making a pro-Palestinian position one of antisemitism. This conflation is increasingly formally accepted by western establishment despite this institutional lack of wisdom, it suits the 1%. With Gunn the position of accepting Muslims as human was also a position of antisemitism.
This brought home the realisation of the continued expansion of the WoT that Bush declared on behalf of the 1% following 9/11. It was clear at the beginning that this WoT was not simply a WoT but a War on Islam. Even before the WoT, Zionist Israel had been positioned as the home of Jews in order to destabilise Arabia; after the WoT began, Israel was given increasing 1% support even though they were less and less popular. The Gunn battle was part of this WoT.
So zandtao then began questioning how far along the 1%s WoT had progressed, and he realised how blinkered his vision had been. Throughout the western world there has been a swing to the right led by puppets like Trump, included in this has been an increasing vilification of Muslims. What vision needs to recognise is that Muslims are being branded as enemy so that it is increasingly easier to make war against them.
Zandtao has previously associated the branded enemy with the war for oil that was also part of the MIC. The MIC is the 1%-wing for accumulation through sales of weapons so the 1% has always promoted war to sell weapons, and the WoT was the MIC replacement for the Cold War to develop sales. But this WoT is not the full extent of the 1%-war, and the Cold War has also recently been expanded through NATO incursions. But even this expansion does not fully describe 1%-war, to understand this we need to step back and see what is happening elsewhere the promotion of AI.
Historically we have seen that the 1% have been able to increase their accumulation through automation. When trade unions objected propaganda was able to nullify the trade unions. Despite what is presented as computers fitting in with the way humans develop, the opposite has happened; society has to apply itself to the restricted menus of computer software if they wish to get anything from government (and elsewhere). Interactions with government is not human but computerised with humans aiding that interaction fitting humans into a computerised conveyor belt. This is all done in the name of efficiency but it is in fact part of human replacement. With AI the IMF, a patriarchy body, is discussing the possibility of 40% losing jobs 40% human replacement.
Let us consider what this human replacement means by examining how human replacement has been dealt with so far. They have become a burden on the state. How has the state dealt with it? By describing these replaced humans as indolent and not trying to work - trying to limit their responsibility. Financially they are a huge burden, and they become a burden on the taxpayer. Compulsory taxation has always been a way for the 1% to ensure that they have a workforce to fulfil their needs. But now taxation is becoming the burden of this workforce, and the 1% are not paying tax through globalised tax dodges tax havens etc. How will governments be able to afford a burden of 40% of the people when AI replaces humans?
Quite simply governments cannot cope financially with these 40%. These 40% will have to fend for themselves, and as the work will be done by AI these 40% will have to turn to survivalist living or crime. The security industry will increase, security that cannot be met by the state as with police but by private security that will protect the 1%; police will become less and less financed as the need to protect society decreases with that private security. Crime will focus on the unprotected forcing the workforce to ally themselves with companies and gated living.
The other way of replacing humans is for them to die during war and famine. Hence we will have the increasing fulfilment of the WoT as War on Muslims. Already Muslim countries have been singled out as war targets Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria and the reconstruction of these countries provides work for those close to the 1% - the security and reconstruction industries.
But human replacement will not stop at 40% as the 1% will recognise the greater accumulation through increasing AI. As with the war industry fewer and fewer soldiers are required to wage war, and more and more profits are coming from drone usage. Wars for depopulation will increase as the need for a workforce diminishes as they are replaced by AI reducing human involvement to drone personnel and AI maintenance?
Essentially there needs to increased recognition of people before profits. At present people are recognising that the 1%-satrapy is responsible for planetary destruction, and there are limiting processes happening to promote ecological sustainability. How will that work if there are less humans and more AI? As AI-wars kill people they will also create environmental destruction, what will be the consequence there?
The 1% are addicted to their lifestyles based on accumulation. The 1% are concerned for the survival of the 1% and their way of life, as 99% we have to recognise what the implications of their accumulation mean for us as humanity. We cannot assume that governments can provide for the people, so governments will be pushed into depopulation measures such as war and capital punishment. Apocalyptic scenarios are scary and part of fiction, but they also need to be seen as portents. The addiction of the 1% overrides any humanitarian decision-making on their part. Rather than financing the existing human replacement the 1% have developed mechanisms that prevent their contribution through taxation. Increasingly humanitarian burdens are falling onto a diminishing workforce and we are letting it happen. There needs to be a more radical OCCUPY that sees the 1% as an enemy, and that we must find ways of surviving that do not conspire with that enemy. We need to see the 1% as enemy of the 99%, with human replacement there becomes an effective dehumanising of the 99% as they are of no value to 1%-accumulation. Confronting that enemy is not now possible as their security and propaganda prevent that. Yet when wise people withdraw, the 1%-addicted satrapy has fewer restrictions.
And when we see war, we always see a strategy of dehumanising the enemy. Now Muslims are being dehumanised, who will be next? Do we blame Israelis for defending their families, or do we look at the 1% for creating and weaponising a Zionist Israel rather than a Jewish homeland? As refugee Muslims find shelter in the West, they will bring in their number the violence of retribution destroying the lives of the 99% whilst the 1% will increasingly find separate sanctuary. What will be the response of Western governments but Muslim repression and then genocide? This is a consequence of the American WoT a major but not sole bastion of the 1%. When we see human replacement by AI there is associated a dehumanising, eg humans are not as intelligent as AI; once dehumanised that replacement can lead to depopulation through war as sector by sector human beings will not be valued compared to AI.
This vision of the world is not scifi but predictable wise interpretation of a predictable future. Such visions come from autonomy that arises from pathtivism. This is not a call for violence against the 1% but a recognition that Gaia and her paths will solve. Follow your path, divest from the 1% where possible, be radical OCCUPY, recognise that 1%-addiction is destroying humanity and that they have lost control. Take back our responsibility before war and depopulation engulfs us all.
Finally vision must see the danger it brings to itself. As we see more and more the destruction that the 1% brings, the more the forces of that destruction will turn on the vision itself. Vision cannot now express itself without repercussion. Increasingly the destructive forces have invaded the backwater of his reclusion. Zandtao has to be more circumspect in his expression. He left the beach once, pointlessly expressing his vision could lead to leaving the beach again. And there was no point, Gunn cannot listen because of his family. Who else there wants to listen? Why open your mouth there? Enjoy the sunset.
|
