zandtaomed advice withdrawn
Zandtao has been working on his egos associated with sanna - see warning below, and this has led to this advice.
The core of any practice is the letting go of ego – or better letting go of egos bit by bit; it might be described differently with different practices. Maybe for some seekers letting go of ego as a whole is a possibility, but for zandtao letting go of egos bit-by-bit is the way of his practice and his zandtaomed advice.
In this advice zandtaomed wants to focus on letting go of ego, and this focus for zandtaomed culminates mainly in step 12 (the 4th stage of tetrad 3) of his practice. In this zandtaomed tries to release egos that have arisen as the 3 kilesa of greed, hatred and delusion, and 4 upadanas of desire, ritual, idealisms and need for self. Also as part of step 12 is what Buddhadasa calls “removing I from the 5 khandhas”. As a seeker to follow this method there would be attempts to let go of each of the 12 sets of egos (3 kilesa, 4upadanas and 5 khandha-releases) in turn until a practice is sufficiently developed where the seeker can release the 12 “at once”. Focus on one ego at a time within each set, examine it in detail, and then let go of the individual egos. Over time a practice can be developed where egos from all 12 can be released each meditation.
But great care needs be taken as such a grouping of 12 can let egos slip by. This is what happened to zandtao in as much as he realised egos had been accumulating as a result of sanna as memory, the issue is that egos can creep up on any seeker and cause problems. Whilst zandtao never thought he was being complacent, this is what was happening. As a seeker it is easy to delude yourself into thinking that egos have been dealt with when all kinds of new ones can emerge or be discovered.
Seekers with a practice need to try to avoid egos as a result of complacency, and this is far from easy. Let’s recap on where egos arise. Through instinct we develop egos in order to survive, as young adults the self-esteem that collects together from all of these instinctive egos/selves helps us gain status within conditioned society. Unfortunately the more successful we are with achievement through self-esteem the more likely we are to delude ourselves that we are content – we don’t want to be seekers, we don’t want to lose that false status and achievement by following the true path. However release of conditioned egos is what happens with mature people who want to follow the path, and with that comes greater understanding and joy in life.
The conditioning process goes on around us all the time. As maturing adults we might begin to think that we have dealt with the conditioning of our upbringing, but we cannot be certain that new egos from conditioning are not arising – either not releasing old egos or forming new egos. Basically we deal with egos at our own pace through ongoing practice. Zandtao knows there are egos present, he works at releasing them with his practice; during his practice and throughout the day (hopefully) he examines whether his behaviour has been affected by ego thus recognising the egos that need to be released.
Paticcasamuppada, the description of dependent origination, talks of how egos arise:-
Let us consider how paticcasamuppada can improve our practice, and to begin to do that let us consider how conditioning through upbringing occurs by the law of paticcasamuppada.
From birth there is ignorance, and the sense events that arise are based in this ignorance. As contact (step 5) arises this is where choice is made, and the choices that are made can lead to “becoming egos” (steps 9 and 10). From birth we are not aware to make choices (at contact), and the choices are initially made through parenting and then later through parenting and the wider community ie conditioned society. From this conditioning a self as a collection of egos is developed, and from self can arise the self-esteem that allows for social success and status.
As a mature person we choose to follow the path and develop our own autonomy. Zandtaomed wants to consider the 5 Dhamma comrades - mindfulness/sati, love/karuna, wisdom/panna, concentration/samadhi and embodiment/sampajanna – here. Buddhadasa taught that they arise through the meditation of MwB, do they arise in other practices? These 5 Dhamma comrades build our autonomy and at the same time are the skills in step 12 used to release egos. How does our autonomy and 5 Dhamma comrades fit in with paticcasamuppada? How do they help us with conditioning as seen through the law of paticcasamuppada?
At some point we might become aware of the suffering that is caused by conditioning (Eckhart calls it firstgrace), and this awareness starts to remove ignorance. Through removal of ignorance the sense events that arise are better; for example because we are aware chauvinist events do not arise so often for us to make a choice at phassa (contact). But if we are not conscious of our conditioning then sense-events can slip through phassa and form egos because of habit, because we are still unaware of some of our conditioning or because through new conditioning we attach and form new egos. Dealing with egos and conditioning is part of the practice, in this way practice - process of releasing egos - fits with the law of paticcasamuppada.
Previous advice talks of recognising individual egos and letting them go. Use of paticcasamuppada can give another way of dealing with ego by using the law in reverse order. Work back down to the sense-event from step 10 – not “becoming an ego” by releasing the attachment and craving that has arisen thus letting go of the ego. What were the feelings that gave rise to the attachment? What was the sense-event that triggered the “becoming ego”? Using paticcasamuppada we can release egos, develop an awareness of how they arose, recognise the trigger event and feelings that led to the ego, and hopefully not choose in contact to develop the ego next time.
Does our practice need to include the use of this law? Perhaps not. Be conscious that this law exists and is at the root of Buddhist practice – and zandtaomed’s practice is Buddhist for releasing egos.
Now zandtao is beginning to consider paticcasamuppada in more detail and this has implications for this advice of zandtaomed – and maybe future advice. When it comes to kilesa and upadana, whilst their arising follows the law of paticcasamuppada such egos are “in plain sight”. In our practice our mindfulness and sampajanna can choose to recognise and release those egos. But egos can also be unconscious as in shadow. Now there is powerful shadow that arises from conditioning usually shadow associated with parenting. This shadow is dealt with through awareness and integration in our practice.
Above attachment to sanna was mentioned as leading to this advice. Sanna is one of the 5 khandhas, the aggregates that make up who we are. Buddhadasa’s advice concerning the 5 khandhas rings in here “removing I and mine from the 5 khandhas”. How do we do that? How do we know the difference between the way a khandha is meant to function and whether a khandha has developed ego? That not knowing is unconscious and is a shadow, yet not the type of shadow that unconsciously adversely affects our behaviour such as a shadow of deeply-buried repression. Zandtao does not consider the khandha shadows in the same light, but there is still this shadow ego attached to khandhas.
Paticcasamuppada can help us see how the khandhas can lead to unconscious egos. Sense-events arise that are automatically handled by the khandhas and most are not made conscious – sight sees far more sense-events than we are conscious of but the khandha-consciousness relating to sight handles most of what is seen. Can we be comfortable with this? Mostly because we trust nature and the khandhas nature provides. But have we developed self-interests that interfere with nature’s good process? If we become more aware of sense-events that arise, we can perhaps recognise such self-interference. As a gross example do we recognise all of our chauvinist behaviour and its impact with regards to race and gender, or do we delude ourselves that such behaviour is not important – selecting what sight sees (what sense-events are seen consciously) to suit chauvinist egos? Referring to paticcasamuppada developing awareness that removes ignorance and being more conscious of the choice we make at phassa can help to release these egos and less threatening shadows.
Zandtao became aware that there was ego associated with sanna, memory was attaching to sense-events thus creating unconscious shadow egos. Through becoming more conscious of memory processes, recognising that memory was attaching to become egos, there was a release of some ego. It felt better. This was carried out in part by body scanning and in part by being aware that there was holding onto memory-concerning-body, recognising the way zandtao held onto certain memories led to a release of these sanna-kaya egos and it felt better. There was not only ill health because of weakness in kaya, but additional ill health because of the ego arising from the reinforcing by memory of that ill health – releasing the memory helped. This then led to zandtao considering sanna attaching to other khandhas and the release of egos.
|